Wednesday, December 12, 2018
'Closely analyse the poems ‘Sacifice’ by Taufiq Rafat and ‘Out, Out’ by Robert Frost\r'
'In preparation for this  raise I  commemorate and  decomposed a series of  poesys.  many of these poems include ââ¬ËTich Miller by Wendy Cope and ââ¬ËCity Jungle by Pie Corbett. For the  primary(prenominal)  protrude of the es presuppose I  necessitate the two poems ââ¬ËSacifice by Taufiq Rafat and ââ¬ËOut, Out by Robert  hoar and  ready  bug out,  most the two different  enculturations. ââ¬ËSacifice is  or so a   patroniseside being  kick ind when they   atomic number 18  set the foundations of a friends  set up, where as ââ¬ËOut, Out is  intimately a  male  electric shaver having his  devolve  chop up  forward by a  boil  see. In class, as a group we  alikek  subjugate  nones about the two poems.\r\nI  give   instantly individu in ally show my understanding of the two poems and  bring through an analysis for them  two. I  provide  promptly  conk out ââ¬ËSacrifice by Taufiq Rafat. The poem is about laying the foundations of a house. To do this they  consecrate    to perform a    rite. The ritual is that the owner of the house has to  yield a goat. In the  prototypical stanza we  female genitalia see that the poet  fingers empathy for the goat as it says ââ¬ËI can feel its point on my throat. It is  bring uping that he has  copen the persona of the goat and feels what it feels.\r\nThis stanza is  close to out of order, as the poet Rafat could have put  inception  quintet ââ¬ËWe   ar laying the foundations of a friends house as his first  cable television service. He could have done this  by choice because he  fatalitys to cr eat upe effect and to catch the readers  guardianship by having a strong first stanza with  expression like ââ¬Ëgeysers. You can tell by the  nomenclature of the poem that the person who is performing the sacrifice is  sickish and doesnt  take to  despatch the goat as it says ââ¬ËA hot sticky sweat breaks out on my  system.\r\nThis  land hold in the poem stands out for me because it creates a strong image in m   y mind and tells me  hardly how he is felling towards the sacrifice. In the  succeeding(prenominal) stanza we  grow out that  on that point is a group of people that  atomic number 18 involved in laying the foundations of a friends house, as the  decry starts with ââ¬ËWe are laying the foundations of a friends house. By the  actors line ââ¬Ëa brief prayer and ââ¬Ëwe stand in a tight circle you can tell that the  refinement of the poem is a religious one and that they are  in any case a close  familiarity by them all involved in a ritual also by them all laying the foundations of a friends house.\r\nThe line ââ¬ËThe heat, and the smell of blood make me dizzy tells you how this sacrifice is making him feel and once  again it shows that he  theorizes this is un educate. I think that when it says the goat has a ââ¬Ëcivilized and patient look it makes me feel that the goat doesnt deserve what is about to happen to it and they are going to kill it when he doesnt expect it.    In the  future(a) stanza they are now performing the sacrifice of the goat. When the poet  issues ââ¬ËPart of the ritual that it is his  hap only it tells you that the person who has to kill the goat is the one who is having his house blessed.\r\nIn the line ââ¬ËHow keenly it cuts! ââ¬Ë the poet Rafat is showing that the goat cuts easily and that it is almost like the knife wants to kill the goat. I think that the explanation  shit at the end shows the  cuff and the response of the poet. When the poet writes ââ¬ËThe movement is a little unsteady this stands out for me because as well as him being nervous I would be too if I had to kill any  living organism.  too I think it is ironic that by him being nervous, because he doesnt want to hurt the goat, he is actually  create the goat to feel more pain by  non being steady.\r\nThe  sacred scripture ââ¬Ë  exactlychering makes this sacrifice feel more unpleasant because butcher means they kill. ââ¬Ë quartet  inure  arriv   e ats imprison my  jerked meat legs this tells us that they are  work ating class people because callo employ  gloves  proposes that people work with their hands. Also by  verbal expression that the hands are calloused, which means harden, it could  betoken that they have hard  feelings to this sacrifice. Also with the  record books ââ¬Ëjerking legs the poet is taken on the persona and empathy of the goat. In the next stanza they have killed the goat and are now  hide it.\r\nWhen Rafat writes ââ¬Ëthe children are fascinated by the tableau he is saying that the children might want to do this in the  prospective and suggests that this  elaboration could be passed through generations. The goat is  bury about forever when it says ââ¬ËTwo spadefuls of dirt  leave behind cover me up forever I feel that it is  grim that some people would  just now kill an animal for their  civilisation and just for astonish about it afterwards. When Rafat says ââ¬Ëa white-bearded man chants som   eaffair holly it is coming back to the idea that their community of interests is a religious community.\r\nAt the end of the sentence we can tell that this sacrifice is recent by the words ââ¬Ëthe cameras click it also suggests that to some this is a  solemnization but as you read the last stanza the poet has  other opinion. The poet Rafat writes ââ¬Ëwe are not laying the foundations of a house, but another Dachau. ââ¬Ë The language he is  victimisation is in truth strong at the end. As I read this last stanza it make me think that when he used the word Dachau that means Concentration Camp or  crimson a Death Camp he  get aheadly shows that he disap screens to the  consentaneous sacrifice as I would but he also makes it  gull that people have different opinions and feelings, to this.\r\nOver all I think that Rafat makes it clear you cant change the  fashion people feel, this whitethorn be because of  on that point  devotion or culture. I will now analyse ââ¬ËOut, Out by    Robert  ice. The poem ââ¬ËOut, Out is about a  unfledged  son who is working in a manufacturing plant in Vermont. As the poem goes on we find out that a buzz  saying the  male child was working with chops off his hand. In the first line the poet frost writes ââ¬ËThe buzz  adage snarled this suggest that by the word snarled there is  riskiness to come. Also personification is used by ââ¬Ëbuzz saw.\r\nThe poet on the spur of the moment changers the  impression of the poem by using the words ââ¬Ësweet-scented and also saying in line five about the ââ¬ËFive Mountain Ranges and ââ¬ËUnder the  old into Vermont. I think that  in the flesh(predicate)ly this was very  gifted because the poet has brought the scene active and goes on to set a pleasant scene with the Mountain Ranges in Vermont. He also tells us a  molybdenum about the culture. He does this by mentioning the Mountains, which tell us that this is an  set-apart community. In line seven the poet has once again cha   nged the tone of the poem by coming back to the saw.\r\nIn this line he has used  repeating by repeating the words ââ¬ËSnarled and Ratted. He explains why the buzz saw was snarling and rattling in the next line by saying ââ¬ËAs it ran light, or had to bear a load. When the poet writes ââ¬Ëand nothing happened:  sidereal day was all but done. This Suggest to the reader that it is just a normal day and that nothing  finical was going to happen. I found this clever because it is misleading. In the next line the poet shows a bit of emotion by saying ââ¬Ëcall it a day, I  respect they might have said. By using the words ââ¬ËI wish it makes you think that something bad  whitethorn happen to him. To  disport the boy the poet writes in the next line. This is the first time the poet introduces him as just a boy. This suggests that as apart of their culture they get young children to work. I  disaccord with this because I think that young children are not as experienced with us   ing  sedate equipment such as a buzz saw and something could happen to them if they are not careful and could get hurt. The poet goes on to introduce his sister in line thirteen ââ¬ËHis sister stood beside them in her apron. As the poet does this it could suggest that as a part of their culture, families work together.\r\n rime also writes that the sisters tell the rest of the workers its supper ââ¬ËTo tell them ââ¬ËSupperââ¬Â. This could suggest that the poet has given them traditional roles for the genders. This is that the men have to do the work and the women have to cook. My response to this is that I disagree because it is sexism and I think that is wrong. In the next  duo of lines Frost  covers how the buzz saw cuts the boys hand off because he is not paying attention and gets  put off by his sister saying to word ââ¬ËSuper and loses his concentration.\r\nFrost writes just after the word ââ¬ËSuper that ââ¬Ëthe saw, As if to prove saws knew what supper mea   nt, leaped out at the boys hand it is as if the saw decides to eat by hearing the hearing the word supper so he users personification. He explains that ââ¬Ëhe must have given the hand and that the boy couldnt pull away in time. ââ¬Ë scarcely the hand! ââ¬Ë the poet writes, which means that he is in shock and dismay by the exclamation mark at the end. By his hand getting chopped off it tells as that it is very physical, manual, dangerous work they do. The boys first outcry was a rueful laugh. This suggests that he doesnt really realise what has happened to him. By the poet using the word ââ¬Ërueful it tells us again that he is in shock and doesnt believe it. Frost writes in line  xx ââ¬Ëas he swung toward them holding up the hand,  half in appeal this could mean that the boy has reacted different to his hand being chopped off. This is because at first he was in shock and then he was  aspect for help by swinging towards them. The poet then writes ââ¬Ëbut half as if t   o keep the life from spilling.\r\nThis could  resuscitate to the title ââ¬ËOut, Out because as the blood is spilling out of him it is also like the life is spilling and going out of his body as well. The boys final reaction is when it says ââ¬Ëthen the boy saw all this suggests that he  feels that he is going to  any be disabled or even  cronk. The poet writes how the boy has now become a teenager by using the words ââ¬Ëbig boy doing a mans work even though the boy is a ââ¬Ëchild at heart. In the next few lines it tells us that the boy has lost his hand and that he has even lost his life.\r\nAt first the poet brings the boy alive by using speech and getting him to say ââ¬ËDont let him cut my hand off. The poet now changers the  on the whole pace of the poem by just having the word ââ¬ËSo by itself. This suggests the finality of the poem. ââ¬ËBut the hand was  at peace(p) already. This means that despite what he wants it doesnt matter because the hand was gone an   d it couldnt have been used again. In the next sentence we find out that their medical  grooming is   rather basic because it says ââ¬Ëthe doctor put him in the dark of ether.\r\nThe ether is for the boy to cope with the pain. The boy ââ¬Ëlay and puffed his lips out with his breath. I think this was sad because we know that he is going to die and that could have been his last breath, but it  all the same suggests that there is life still there. ââ¬ËAnd then-the watcher at his  nervous impulse took f right. This just means that the fright caused his pulse to go down. Also the hyphen could suggest a spectacular pause. His life is slowly going away from him now when Frost writes ââ¬ËLittle-less-nothing! I think that the exclamation mark means the end and it goes on to say he has died ââ¬Ëand that ended it. My response to the end of the poem is a one of disbelieve. This is because the poet writes ââ¬ËSince they were not the one dead,  saturnine to their affairs. I pers   onally find this hard to believe that their culture is quite hard hearted and that they think death and danger is a normal part of life. I dont know how some people would just carry on with their lives instantly and think it was just another death.\r\nThis poem must be quite old because of the whole attitude towards death has changed. This is not like ââ¬ËSacifice because that was quite recent because of the ââ¬ËCameras. I will now write about the similarities and differences  surrounded by the two poems and compare them both. I will start off with some of the similarities between ââ¬ËSacifice and ââ¬ËOut, Out. The first thing I have  honour between the two was that they both have quite a sad, and depressing tone towards them. This is because they are both about death. Also in both of the poems the characters take the deaths quite lightly e. . in ââ¬ËSacrifice they just  blockade about the goat ââ¬ËTwo spadefuls of dirt will cover me up forever and in ââ¬ËOut, O   ut they feel that it is just another death ââ¬ËSince they were not the one dead, turned to their affairs. Another similarity is that the poet, or the voice of the poem, does not appear to share the views of the communities described. This is because in ââ¬ËSacrifice the poet does not want to kill the goat but community does and in ââ¬ËOut, Out the boy does not want to carry on working ââ¬ËCall it a day, I wish they might have sad.\r\nThey both tell a story and they create a serious tone because they are in blank verse. As they are in blank verse it sounds like  soulfulness is telling a story. The last similarity I found is that they both give insights into the cultures in which they are set. Also they imply  reprimand of the aspect of the culture they are describing. For example in ââ¬ËOut, Out one criticism is that a young boy like him should not be working at such a young age but it is apart of their culture to do so. An example of a criticism in ââ¬ËSacrifice is    that they should not kill the goat but they do so because it is apart of their culture.\r\nNow I will describe some of the differences between the two poems. The main difference would have to be that ââ¬ËOut, Out is about a human where as ââ¬ËSacrifice is about an animal. They both describe different cultures. For example ââ¬ËSacrifice is a religious community and ââ¬ËOut, Out isnt. I found that one difference was that ââ¬ËSacrifice includes empathy with the goat, where as ââ¬ËOut, Out just describes what happens. Also ââ¬ËSacrifice is divided into stanzas and is in clear sections, where as ââ¬ËOut, Out is not in stanzas and just flows chronologically through the story.\r\nAnother difference would have to be that the poet in ââ¬ËSacrifice is more involved where as in ââ¬ËOut, Out the poet is more of an observer. The last difference I can think of is that the death of the boy was an accident where as the death of the goat was on purpose. Overall I found    that ââ¬ËSacrifice by Taufiq Rafat was very sad because I dont think it was right for them to go ahead with the ritual sacrifice of the goat just because they are laying the foundations of a house. The only decent and respectful bit towards the goat was from the poet himself.\r\nHe doesnt think this was right every and at least his heart is in the right place. He lets us know from the very starting time that his real sympathies are with the goat: ââ¬ËAs he moves the knife across the neck of the goat I can feel its point on my throat. But Rafats sympathy isnt much use to the goat. This is because if he has his doubts about the ceremony and he knows he is going to sacrifice the goat, I dont get why he is there in the first place if he doesnt want to kill the goat. Apart from this I found it a very interesting poem to read.\r\nFor ââ¬ËOut, Out by Robert Frost I felt that it is a tragedy that a young boy who lives in a  arcadian area, is propelled to work longs  eld, doing a     phone line that is fit for a man and that he is doing this instead of spending the days as a youth. When Frost writes ââ¬ËCall it a day, I wish they might have said, to please the boy by giving him the half  minute that a boy counts so much when  salvage from work I felt that not only do these lines inform us that the boy wished he did not have to work but it also reflects a sense of regret on the bystanders part.\r\nIt proposes the fact that if they had  i accost up early, or even not made this young boy do a job fit for his superior then his death may have never occurred. I found this part particularly important to me because if they had done the right thing and not gave him this job he could have still been alive! I liked the fact that Frost uses particular techniques such as, personification, repetition, onomatopoeia, and word structure, which produced a  small rhythm to the poem. Another bit of this poem I liked is that throughout the poem the buzz saw is personified and is    given human and animal like qualities. And the saw snared and rattled, snarled and rattled as it ran light or had to bear a load. This I found suggests that the saw is in fact some kind of creature, which may posses more power than the boy. To some up I think that Frosts ideas of life and death, the harshness of lifes demands, and how he shows personal interest in the way in which individuals deal with lifes issues such as death are  intelligibly reflected in the poem ââ¬ËOut, Out. I think that this was a great poem to read.\r\n'  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment