Fear of Crime

Introduction Fear of detestation in members of our inn today has been astray interrogationed. For the purpose of this essay, attention of law-breaking is used in the context of an idiosyncratics perceived bump of sightly a victim of criminal offense. In this essay it is argued that the remote and the youngest members of our society ar the or so precautionful of plague and that, of these mature aggroups the time-worn have the lowest risk of becoming victims of disgust. Firstly, research shows that idolize of crime is wide spread and that certain get along groups ar more(prenominal) fearful of becoming victims than otherwises.Secondly, that the Medias portrayal of crimes contri scarcees to societys perceptions of safety and crime itself, increasing fear of crime in these get along groups. Thirdly, that the Elderly fears of crime and perceived risk of development is also contributed to by social and physiological incidentors, such as vulnerability that win dings to altered lifestyle changes. Data confirms that levels of victimisation marks be low for the patriarchal but high for the young, which is in contrast to those in the elderly age group having heightened levels of fear.In conclusion, fear of crime is becoming a serious social issue as our population ages macrocosm that the elderly are becoming the roughly fearful of crime whilst the youngest age group with the highest fear are most apparent to become victims of crime. Discussion Firstly, we see that in advanced(a) society today that a growing fear of crime is widely recognised. It is acknowledged that the elderly aged 65 and over, and the youngest members aged 16 24 of our society have the highest fear of crime in comparison to other age groups(Johnson, 2005).Australia has an aging population (James, 1992 p. 1), for those 85 and over numbers has dual and thither are increased numbers of those aged 65 and over. The move twenty years spanning from 1990 to 2010 has s een the number of elderly people in our society increase by 170% in comparison to around 30% for total population growth for Australia, where those age 15 are seen to be decreasing (Australian government agency of Statistics, 2010).This correlated to the findings from the 2004 International hatred Victimisation refresh (Johnson, 2005) showing that the age groups 15 24 and 65 and over were the most likely to answer the series of questions asked around feelings of safety when walking totally at wickedness, utilising or time lag for public transportation at night and whether they believed they would be victims of burglary in the ext year as unsafe or truly unsafe. Secondly, it is argued that the Medias representations of criminal acts and events through sensationalised stories depicting crimes that are violent and those with a knowledgeable nature these have contributed to and influenced levels of fear and perceptions of risk for the age groups 15 24, and 65 years and over.The first edition of Violence Today (Chappell, 1989) connect societys perceptions of violent crime to media stories and publicity that is focussed on crimes of a violent nature that attributes to growing fears of crime posturing Australia is succumbing to a torrent of crime beyond the control of tralatitious system of traditional law (Chappell, 1989). The focus on violent and sexually explicit crimes by the media has left our society with the misconception that these sorts of crimes are an everyday occurrence.The Australian Survey of fond Attitudes (Roberts & Indermaur, Australian implant of Criminology 2007) save that over half of those aged 65 and over believed that crime had increased over a period of deuce years before the survey was completed, this is attributed to an individuals media consumption whether it be newspapers, internet or television of factual or fictional medians (Kort-Butler & Sittner Hartshorn, 2011).The Australian Survey of companionable Attitudes also col lected data on the medians that individuals withdraw their crime and criminal justice beliefs and views from, and observed that the media remains the most chief(prenominal) source in informing Australians views of crime(Roberts & Indermaur, Australian Institute of Criminology 2007 p. 9). The magnificence given to certain crimes in the daily newspapers and other media sources shows us consequence to the fact that crime is a tiptopic that has the publics affaire and is a focus of their worries (Australian actors assistant of Statistics, 2001).It goes on to discuss the fact that crime as reported on by the media increases the publics levels of fears and that there is little or no correlation to actual levels of violent crime in our society today. Thirdly, crime victimisation data collected by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (2008-2009, p. 17) reflects that those 65 and above are the least likely to be victims of crime with a victimisation rate much visit than all other age groups in the category of personal combat. This cannot be said or the younger age groups of 16 -24 whos fear of crime can be linked to high numbers of victimisation in the same category. Carcach, Graycar & Muscat (2001) attribute social and communal activities that elderly people partake in to this anomaly betwixt the elderly fear of crime and victimisation rates. The change in activities of the elderly over meter may contribute to the lower victimisation rates reported where on the other hand the young tend to have many more communal social activities which serve to increase their chances of victimisation.The data collected from the horror Victimisation Survey (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2008-2009) although it showed very little difference surrounded by the fear levels for the youngest age group and that of the older age group of 65 and over the differences in social activities and community relationships and the fact that the elderly are far less likely to be out alone without a companion, or travelling on public transport or waiting for the same can be accounted for, by personal vulnerability.A attain concept used to explain high levels of perceived risk of victimisation is that of vulnerability. Powell & Wahidin (2007, p. 94) assert the fear of crime operates on a myriad of stimulated and practical levels from feeling vulnerable and isolated, to affecting personal well being. Vulnerability has been attributed to contributing to fear of crime within the elderly age group (Carcach et al, 2001). It has been argued that personal vulnerability (Franklin, Franklin & Fearn, 2008 p. 06), the inability for an individual to protect themselves repayable to lack of physical strength (James, 1992) and the feelings of powerlessness to resist attack (Callanan & Teasdale, 2009 p. 362) and their difficulty of being able to heal from an act of victimisation (Johnson, 2005 p. 33) explains the disparity between higher levels of fear and that of actual victimis ation. Cossman & Rader (2011, p. 143) add further to this that most elderly people are now living alone, either having lost a lifetime partner through death, or hospitalisation due to debility or illness also attributes to higher levels of fear of crime.A shop class held between several services and organisations in South Australia on law-breaking and the Elderly identified that elderly people thought themselves to be the most victimised by crime, that during the day break-ins caused them fear, however break-ins with the potential for personal assault caused the most fear after dark, these fears impacted on all aspects of their lives, which in turn has restricted and isolated them from their communities and the lifestyles they have been previously accustomed to living. Doherty, 1991, p. 1)(Johnson, 2005, p. 29) The elderly by far have the highest levels of fear that are based on misconceptions that they perceive about crime in our society today. The young 15 24 years of age percei ve their risk of victimisation to be high and statistics show that in 2005 this age group had the highest victimisation rate for crimes against the person ( Australian Institute of Criminology, 2006). ConclusionFear of crime in our society has far reaching implications, Australia has an aging population that exhibits one of the highest levels of fear of crime that can be attributed to feelings of vulnerability, yet statistics have shown the elderly to be the least likely to be victims of crime. Their perceived fear of victimisation has lead to changes in their lifestyles in order to protect themselves, based on misconceived notions that they are the most victimised in society.The young aged 16-24 years of age also have a high level of perceived risk from crime but this is in proportion to the victimisation rates recorded for this age group. Perceptions of fear and perceived risk of crime are contributed to by the medias portrayal of crimes that have a violent or sexual nature which further serves to contribute to a growing fear of crime. The fact that society tends to get its views and beliefs of crime and criminal justice from the media means that misconceptions about the perceived risk of victimisation tend to be over the top and misinformed.References Australian Institute of Criminology 2006, Australian disgust facts and figures 2005, Crime Facts Info, no. 120, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2001, Measuring Wellbeing Frameworks for Australian loving Statistics, 2001, cat. no. 4160. 0 Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2008-2009, Crime Victimisation, Australia, cat. no 4530. 0, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2010, existence by Age and Sex, Australian States and Territories, cat.No. 3201. 0, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra. Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2010, Australian Social Trends, cat no. 4102. 0, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra. Callanan, V. J. , & Teasdale, B. (2009). An exploration of gender differences in measurement of fear of crime. Feminist Criminology, 4(4), 359-376. inside10. 1177/1557085109345462 Carcach, C. Graycar, A. & Muscat, G. 2001 The Victimisation of Older Australians, Trends and Issues in Crime and flagitious Justice, no. 212, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra. Chappell, D, 1989. Violence Today, no. 1 Violence, Crime and Australian Society, National Committee on Violence, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra. Doherty, B. 1991, Home Assist A new approach to House Security, surgical incision of Employment and Further Education, Adelaide. Fearn, N. E. , Franklin, T. W. , & Franklin, C. A. (2008). A multilevel analysis of the vulnerability, disorder, and social integration models of fear of crime. Social Justice Research, 21(2), 204-227. doi10. 1007/s11211-008-0069-9 Hartshorn, K. J. S. , & Kort? Butler, L. A. (2011). Watching the Detecti ves Crime Programming, Fear of Crime, and Attitudes about the Criminal Justice System, sociological Quarterly, 52(1), 36-55. doi10. 1111/j. 1533-8525. 2010. 01191. x James, M. 1992, The Elderly as Victims of Crime, Abuse and Neglect, Trends and Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, no. 37, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra. Johnson, H. 2005, Crime Victimisation in Australia Key Results of the 2004 International Crime Victimisation Survey, Research and common Policy Series, no. 64, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra. Powell, J. & Wahidin.A. (2008). Understanding old age and victimisation A critical exploration. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy,28(3/4), 90-99. doi10. 1108/01443330810862160 Rader, N. , & Cossman, J. (2011). Fear of Crime and Personal Vulnerability Examining Self-Reported Health, Sociological Spectrum,31(2), 141-162. doi10. 1080/02732173. 2011. 541339 Roberts, L. & Indermaur, D. 2007, What Australians think about crime and jus tice results from the 2007 Survey of Social Attitudes, Research and Public Policy Series 101, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.