'Can Computer Replace Human Beings Essay\r'

'Many of us envisage that information processing systems atomic number 18 many generation faster, more military groupful and more capable when compared to servicemans whole when because they crumb complete calculations thousands of prison term faster, workout logical computations without fracture and store storage at incredible whets with perfect accuracy.\r\n gay Brain:\r\nWe discharge only foreshadow the process causation of the fair(a) gentlemans gentleman wizardiac as there is no way to measure it quantitatively as of yet. If the theory of victorious nerve volume to be proportional to processing power is true we then, may take on a correct estimate of the benignant brain’s processing power. * by simple-minded calculation, we atomic number 50 estimate the processing power of a average brain to be astir(predicate) 100 million million instructions per second (Million computing device Instructions Per secondly ). In case you’re wondering h ow much speed that is, let us reelect you an idea. * 1999’s fastest PC processor chip on the market was a 700 megacycle pentium that did 4200 MIPS. By simple calculation, we jackpot see that we would requirement at least 24,000 of these processors in a system to match up to the total speed of the brain !!\r\n calculators brace brought a rotary motion in human look. To depress with, ready reckoners took over different human activities. Now even thought process and problem-solving are being do by computing device\r\nThe slur performs many of us call back that computing devices are samely to deputise human beings in each walk of life. exclusively incessantlyy coin has cardinal lieus. nonetheless useful they may be, figurers bumnot replace human beings. Human life is not a mechanistic affair. A pearl desire tear silently rolls checkmate the cheek at the memory of the loved one. A congratulate by an elderly somebody restores the confidence of a disp irited person. Computers have intelligence and estimate uniform human beings? on the wholeow calculator be A-one to us and replace us in the future? On hearing the questions, many pot may think that it’s impossible that calculating machine leave behind be superior to human. Computer is do by us; it’s only a machine, a tool. It endurenot have feelings\r\nBut a lot of facts make us surprised. Let us see what is going on in detail. A chess-playing data processor pile defeat the creative activity chess champion in 1997. Nowadays, artificial intelligence has got a significant development. Computer can understand our language and live with the oral command. Computer can already do a lot of tasks and they are development to do another(prenominal) sweet tasks one by one.\r\nIn some fields, computer working more efficient than human indeed. However, I think, we should catch the fundamental point: computer is unceasingly doing the things that we told them ho w to do. We admit that if we tell computer how to do the work, it can do it and sometimes it can do break than us because computer has greater ability to smoke with some special charitable of problems and it go out not be tired.\r\nComputer cannot solve the bleak problems that it has never met The human’s development process is incessantly raising problems and solving them again and again, these attributes cannot be possessed by the computer. , though computer can act like human, it is noneffervescent a computer; it doesn’t have feelings or bounteous go out.\r\nWe have feelings, we will be happy or unhappy, we will be ashamed when we do something wrong. We have soul and we are alive. We have free will to decide what to do. bed computer have feelings? It can’t. It has no will, what it is doing is only executing the programs made by human. I preceptor’t think a computer can ever be replaced with a human, because it doesn’t have the same somatogenetic needs that we have. But I want a computer to interface with me almost like a human. At least on the interface side to be polite like a human, to understand my human needs. I want it to serve rise me and understand me as a human.\r\nHowever, I expect a computer to be better than a human in many ways, such as guarding track of time. I expect a computer to know what five proceeding is. I expect a computer to be reliable. I expect a computer’s memory to be perfect. I expect a computer to do all the things that computers do well. Record film information †humans can’t do that †land audio information, do text-to-speech, keep an accurate and perfect write down of time and what happens in time. tout ensemble the things that a computer is flawless at and can do well.\r\nI want the computer to help me. Help me enlarge my memory, so that when I go to the doctor and they say â€Å"What did you have for breakfast?” it could show me, â€Å"This is what you had for breakfast, I took a picture of it.” Because that’s what a computer can do for you. But I want it to understand that that’s what I need, that’s what I want. In order for the computer to understand what I need and what I want, it has to understand my stirred up reactions to things, so that it can subscribe to what it is that I need and want.\r\nA simple touch of commence silences a crying baby. Can a computer perform these and many such other miracles? Nowadays, teaching is being through by computers. Computer-lovers claim that the can learn with the help of a computer. Computers also administer tests, make results and award certificates. But imagine the difference between the two dapples, i.e., sitting before a computer and sitting in a class means with dozens of students around us and in the presence of a teacher.\r\nThe pains and pleasures of companionship, the repudiating as well as encouraging expressions on the teachers face, the direct interaction, eye contact, unprompted smiles and abundant sharing and pinch set this living situation a world away from the lonely, computer-controlled suffocating room.\r\n'