Wednesday, December 12, 2018
'Closely analyse the poems ‘Sacifice’ by Taufiq Rafat and ‘Out, Out’ by Robert Frost\r'
'In preparation for this raise I commemorate and decomposed a series of poesys. many of these poems include ââ¬ËTich Miller by Wendy Cope and ââ¬ËCity Jungle by Pie Corbett. For the primary(prenominal) protrude of the es presuppose I necessitate the two poems ââ¬ËSacifice by Taufiq Rafat and ââ¬ËOut, Out by Robert hoar and ready bug out, most the two different enculturations. ââ¬ËSacifice is or so a patroniseside being kick ind when they atomic number 18 set the foundations of a friends set up, where as ââ¬ËOut, Out is intimately a male electric shaver having his devolve chop up forward by a boil see. In class, as a group we alikek subjugate nones about the two poems.\r\nI give instantly individu in ally show my understanding of the two poems and bring through an analysis for them two. I provide promptly conk out ââ¬ËSacrifice by Taufiq Rafat. The poem is about laying the foundations of a house. To do this they consecrate to perform a rite. The ritual is that the owner of the house has to yield a goat. In the prototypical stanza we female genitalia see that the poet fingers empathy for the goat as it says ââ¬ËI can feel its point on my throat. It is bring uping that he has copen the persona of the goat and feels what it feels.\r\nThis stanza is close to out of order, as the poet Rafat could have put inception quintet ââ¬ËWe ar laying the foundations of a friends house as his first cable television service. He could have done this by choice because he fatalitys to cr eat upe effect and to catch the readers guardianship by having a strong first stanza with expression like ââ¬Ëgeysers. You can tell by the nomenclature of the poem that the person who is performing the sacrifice is sickish and doesnt take to despatch the goat as it says ââ¬ËA hot sticky sweat breaks out on my system.\r\nThis land hold in the poem stands out for me because it creates a strong image in m y mind and tells me hardly how he is felling towards the sacrifice. In the succeeding(prenominal) stanza we grow out that on that point is a group of people that atomic number 18 involved in laying the foundations of a friends house, as the decry starts with ââ¬ËWe are laying the foundations of a friends house. By the actors line ââ¬Ëa brief prayer and ââ¬Ëwe stand in a tight circle you can tell that the refinement of the poem is a religious one and that they are in any case a close familiarity by them all involved in a ritual also by them all laying the foundations of a friends house.\r\nThe line ââ¬ËThe heat, and the smell of blood make me dizzy tells you how this sacrifice is making him feel and once again it shows that he theorizes this is un educate. I think that when it says the goat has a ââ¬Ëcivilized and patient look it makes me feel that the goat doesnt deserve what is about to happen to it and they are going to kill it when he doesnt expect it. In the future(a) stanza they are now performing the sacrifice of the goat. When the poet issues ââ¬ËPart of the ritual that it is his hap only it tells you that the person who has to kill the goat is the one who is having his house blessed.\r\nIn the line ââ¬ËHow keenly it cuts! ââ¬Ë the poet Rafat is showing that the goat cuts easily and that it is almost like the knife wants to kill the goat. I think that the explanation shit at the end shows the cuff and the response of the poet. When the poet writes ââ¬ËThe movement is a little unsteady this stands out for me because as well as him being nervous I would be too if I had to kill any living organism. too I think it is ironic that by him being nervous, because he doesnt want to hurt the goat, he is actually create the goat to feel more pain by non being steady.\r\nThe sacred scripture ââ¬Ë exactlychering makes this sacrifice feel more unpleasant because butcher means they kill. ââ¬Ë quartet inure arriv e ats imprison my jerked meat legs this tells us that they are work ating class people because callo employ gloves proposes that people work with their hands. Also by verbal expression that the hands are calloused, which means harden, it could betoken that they have hard feelings to this sacrifice. Also with the record books ââ¬Ëjerking legs the poet is taken on the persona and empathy of the goat. In the next stanza they have killed the goat and are now hide it.\r\nWhen Rafat writes ââ¬Ëthe children are fascinated by the tableau he is saying that the children might want to do this in the prospective and suggests that this elaboration could be passed through generations. The goat is bury about forever when it says ââ¬ËTwo spadefuls of dirt leave behind cover me up forever I feel that it is grim that some people would just now kill an animal for their civilisation and just for astonish about it afterwards. When Rafat says ââ¬Ëa white-bearded man chants som eaffair holly it is coming back to the idea that their community of interests is a religious community.\r\nAt the end of the sentence we can tell that this sacrifice is recent by the words ââ¬Ëthe cameras click it also suggests that to some this is a solemnization but as you read the last stanza the poet has other opinion. The poet Rafat writes ââ¬Ëwe are not laying the foundations of a house, but another Dachau. ââ¬Ë The language he is victimisation is in truth strong at the end. As I read this last stanza it make me think that when he used the word Dachau that means Concentration Camp or crimson a Death Camp he get aheadly shows that he disap screens to the consentaneous sacrifice as I would but he also makes it gull that people have different opinions and feelings, to this.\r\nOver all I think that Rafat makes it clear you cant change the fashion people feel, this whitethorn be because of on that point devotion or culture. I will now analyse ââ¬ËOut, Out by Robert ice. The poem ââ¬ËOut, Out is about a unfledged son who is working in a manufacturing plant in Vermont. As the poem goes on we find out that a buzz saying the male child was working with chops off his hand. In the first line the poet frost writes ââ¬ËThe buzz adage snarled this suggest that by the word snarled there is riskiness to come. Also personification is used by ââ¬Ëbuzz saw.\r\nThe poet on the spur of the moment changers the impression of the poem by using the words ââ¬Ësweet-scented and also saying in line five about the ââ¬ËFive Mountain Ranges and ââ¬ËUnder the old into Vermont. I think that in the flesh(predicate)ly this was very gifted because the poet has brought the scene active and goes on to set a pleasant scene with the Mountain Ranges in Vermont. He also tells us a molybdenum about the culture. He does this by mentioning the Mountains, which tell us that this is an set-apart community. In line seven the poet has once again cha nged the tone of the poem by coming back to the saw.\r\nIn this line he has used repeating by repeating the words ââ¬ËSnarled and Ratted. He explains why the buzz saw was snarling and rattling in the next line by saying ââ¬ËAs it ran light, or had to bear a load. When the poet writes ââ¬Ëand nothing happened: sidereal day was all but done. This Suggest to the reader that it is just a normal day and that nothing finical was going to happen. I found this clever because it is misleading. In the next line the poet shows a bit of emotion by saying ââ¬Ëcall it a day, I respect they might have said. By using the words ââ¬ËI wish it makes you think that something bad whitethorn happen to him. To disport the boy the poet writes in the next line. This is the first time the poet introduces him as just a boy. This suggests that as apart of their culture they get young children to work. I disaccord with this because I think that young children are not as experienced with us ing sedate equipment such as a buzz saw and something could happen to them if they are not careful and could get hurt. The poet goes on to introduce his sister in line thirteen ââ¬ËHis sister stood beside them in her apron. As the poet does this it could suggest that as a part of their culture, families work together.\r\n rime also writes that the sisters tell the rest of the workers its supper ââ¬ËTo tell them ââ¬ËSupperââ¬Â. This could suggest that the poet has given them traditional roles for the genders. This is that the men have to do the work and the women have to cook. My response to this is that I disagree because it is sexism and I think that is wrong. In the next duo of lines Frost covers how the buzz saw cuts the boys hand off because he is not paying attention and gets put off by his sister saying to word ââ¬ËSuper and loses his concentration.\r\nFrost writes just after the word ââ¬ËSuper that ââ¬Ëthe saw, As if to prove saws knew what supper mea nt, leaped out at the boys hand it is as if the saw decides to eat by hearing the hearing the word supper so he users personification. He explains that ââ¬Ëhe must have given the hand and that the boy couldnt pull away in time. ââ¬Ë scarcely the hand! ââ¬Ë the poet writes, which means that he is in shock and dismay by the exclamation mark at the end. By his hand getting chopped off it tells as that it is very physical, manual, dangerous work they do. The boys first outcry was a rueful laugh. This suggests that he doesnt really realise what has happened to him. By the poet using the word ââ¬Ërueful it tells us again that he is in shock and doesnt believe it. Frost writes in line xx ââ¬Ëas he swung toward them holding up the hand, half in appeal this could mean that the boy has reacted different to his hand being chopped off. This is because at first he was in shock and then he was aspect for help by swinging towards them. The poet then writes ââ¬Ëbut half as if t o keep the life from spilling.\r\nThis could resuscitate to the title ââ¬ËOut, Out because as the blood is spilling out of him it is also like the life is spilling and going out of his body as well. The boys final reaction is when it says ââ¬Ëthen the boy saw all this suggests that he feels that he is going to any be disabled or even cronk. The poet writes how the boy has now become a teenager by using the words ââ¬Ëbig boy doing a mans work even though the boy is a ââ¬Ëchild at heart. In the next few lines it tells us that the boy has lost his hand and that he has even lost his life.\r\nAt first the poet brings the boy alive by using speech and getting him to say ââ¬ËDont let him cut my hand off. The poet now changers the on the whole pace of the poem by just having the word ââ¬ËSo by itself. This suggests the finality of the poem. ââ¬ËBut the hand was at peace(p) already. This means that despite what he wants it doesnt matter because the hand was gone an d it couldnt have been used again. In the next sentence we find out that their medical grooming is rather basic because it says ââ¬Ëthe doctor put him in the dark of ether.\r\nThe ether is for the boy to cope with the pain. The boy ââ¬Ëlay and puffed his lips out with his breath. I think this was sad because we know that he is going to die and that could have been his last breath, but it all the same suggests that there is life still there. ââ¬ËAnd then-the watcher at his nervous impulse took f right. This just means that the fright caused his pulse to go down. Also the hyphen could suggest a spectacular pause. His life is slowly going away from him now when Frost writes ââ¬ËLittle-less-nothing! I think that the exclamation mark means the end and it goes on to say he has died ââ¬Ëand that ended it. My response to the end of the poem is a one of disbelieve. This is because the poet writes ââ¬ËSince they were not the one dead, saturnine to their affairs. I pers onally find this hard to believe that their culture is quite hard hearted and that they think death and danger is a normal part of life. I dont know how some people would just carry on with their lives instantly and think it was just another death.\r\nThis poem must be quite old because of the whole attitude towards death has changed. This is not like ââ¬ËSacifice because that was quite recent because of the ââ¬ËCameras. I will now write about the similarities and differences surrounded by the two poems and compare them both. I will start off with some of the similarities between ââ¬ËSacifice and ââ¬ËOut, Out. The first thing I have honour between the two was that they both have quite a sad, and depressing tone towards them. This is because they are both about death. Also in both of the poems the characters take the deaths quite lightly e. . in ââ¬ËSacrifice they just blockade about the goat ââ¬ËTwo spadefuls of dirt will cover me up forever and in ââ¬ËOut, O ut they feel that it is just another death ââ¬ËSince they were not the one dead, turned to their affairs. Another similarity is that the poet, or the voice of the poem, does not appear to share the views of the communities described. This is because in ââ¬ËSacrifice the poet does not want to kill the goat but community does and in ââ¬ËOut, Out the boy does not want to carry on working ââ¬ËCall it a day, I wish they might have sad.\r\nThey both tell a story and they create a serious tone because they are in blank verse. As they are in blank verse it sounds like soulfulness is telling a story. The last similarity I found is that they both give insights into the cultures in which they are set. Also they imply reprimand of the aspect of the culture they are describing. For example in ââ¬ËOut, Out one criticism is that a young boy like him should not be working at such a young age but it is apart of their culture to do so. An example of a criticism in ââ¬ËSacrifice is that they should not kill the goat but they do so because it is apart of their culture.\r\nNow I will describe some of the differences between the two poems. The main difference would have to be that ââ¬ËOut, Out is about a human where as ââ¬ËSacrifice is about an animal. They both describe different cultures. For example ââ¬ËSacrifice is a religious community and ââ¬ËOut, Out isnt. I found that one difference was that ââ¬ËSacrifice includes empathy with the goat, where as ââ¬ËOut, Out just describes what happens. Also ââ¬ËSacrifice is divided into stanzas and is in clear sections, where as ââ¬ËOut, Out is not in stanzas and just flows chronologically through the story.\r\nAnother difference would have to be that the poet in ââ¬ËSacrifice is more involved where as in ââ¬ËOut, Out the poet is more of an observer. The last difference I can think of is that the death of the boy was an accident where as the death of the goat was on purpose. Overall I found that ââ¬ËSacrifice by Taufiq Rafat was very sad because I dont think it was right for them to go ahead with the ritual sacrifice of the goat just because they are laying the foundations of a house. The only decent and respectful bit towards the goat was from the poet himself.\r\nHe doesnt think this was right every and at least his heart is in the right place. He lets us know from the very starting time that his real sympathies are with the goat: ââ¬ËAs he moves the knife across the neck of the goat I can feel its point on my throat. But Rafats sympathy isnt much use to the goat. This is because if he has his doubts about the ceremony and he knows he is going to sacrifice the goat, I dont get why he is there in the first place if he doesnt want to kill the goat. Apart from this I found it a very interesting poem to read.\r\nFor ââ¬ËOut, Out by Robert Frost I felt that it is a tragedy that a young boy who lives in a arcadian area, is propelled to work longs eld, doing a phone line that is fit for a man and that he is doing this instead of spending the days as a youth. When Frost writes ââ¬ËCall it a day, I wish they might have said, to please the boy by giving him the half minute that a boy counts so much when salvage from work I felt that not only do these lines inform us that the boy wished he did not have to work but it also reflects a sense of regret on the bystanders part.\r\nIt proposes the fact that if they had i accost up early, or even not made this young boy do a job fit for his superior then his death may have never occurred. I found this part particularly important to me because if they had done the right thing and not gave him this job he could have still been alive! I liked the fact that Frost uses particular techniques such as, personification, repetition, onomatopoeia, and word structure, which produced a small rhythm to the poem. Another bit of this poem I liked is that throughout the poem the buzz saw is personified and is given human and animal like qualities. And the saw snared and rattled, snarled and rattled as it ran light or had to bear a load. This I found suggests that the saw is in fact some kind of creature, which may posses more power than the boy. To some up I think that Frosts ideas of life and death, the harshness of lifes demands, and how he shows personal interest in the way in which individuals deal with lifes issues such as death are intelligibly reflected in the poem ââ¬ËOut, Out. I think that this was a great poem to read.\r\n'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment