Criminal Justice Trends Paper Essay

In this paper I pull up stakes be evaluating past, present, and afterlife trends pertaining to the corrections system. in that location are m whatsoever different trends that punitory facilities hurl used in the past and these trends have continued on to modern day and perhaps exit continue on into the future. As part of my evaluation I will identify and analyze past, current and future issues facing the corrections system today and also I will discuss the budgetary and managerial impact that future trends will likely have non only on the corrections system, solely also on the otherwise components of the vile arbitrator system like law enforcement and the court system. Trends of correctionsIn the past before there were prisons and put behind barss the punishment of crimes were cruel and dangerous. roughly of the punishments in the past included flogging, mutilation, branding, public humiliation, or exile. Today our punitory facilities focus on rehabilitating criminals so that they can be functional in society one of the ways that is pursued is through community establish corrections to save follows instead of housing an sting. Community establish corrections is used as an alternative to being locked up, this is also cost effective rather than housing them in prison or jail because they foot the notification. Community based corrections is known as parole, probation, home arrest, or electronic monitoring.Community based corrections is a perk and there are galore(postnominal) rules that need to be followed, and if they disobey any of the rules the get sent back to prison or jail. Currently we have a bill that passed in calcium c in alled AB 109 and it was passed to release many inmates to lower the overpopulation of inmates and the end rising costs to manse an inmate. The state expects to stifle the prison inmate population by about 14,000 in 2011-2012 and near 40,000 upon full implementation in 2014-2015.The state estimates that these r eductions will result in a state savings of about $453 million in 2011-2012 and up to $1.5 billion upon full implementation. (Taylor, 2011). This assembly bill will just clear a future puzzle though, when all these inmates get released out into the communities most of them will end up back in prison. According to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation the recidivism rate of inmates that were returned back into a punitory facility within tercet years was 63.7% and the other 36.3% were successful three years out of prison. AB 109 will not decrease the inmate population that largely in the long run according to those statistics. The bill will also increase the caseloads on probation officers, making it harder to keep a good eye on all inmates roaming in the communities, allowing them to reoffend put the problem back in the hands of law enforcement. Issues Facing the Criminal arbiter SystemThe current issues facing prisons are they are being over crowded, and t hey are too expensive to manage. Assembly Bill AB 109 tries to exempt the problems of over crowding but I believe that it is a short theme because of the recidivism rate. Alternate correction systems would reduce costs to the state, and maybe plane be to a greater extent affective than jail or prison time. on that point are alternatives to jail and prison like we discussed earlier, but those are all state funded. In the future maybe there will be programs funded by organizations that want to help rehabilitate criminals or they make the criminal pay for their services. Some examples might be intensive supervised probation, house arrest, electronic monitoring, community residential centers, or shock incarceration.I bring forward we need to have a self-sufficient prison that keeps inmates busy working(a) for what they have, to cut stack costs of prisons. One way to cut follow out costs is to actually use our expiry penalty, what is the severity of having a death penalty if yo u know you are going to sit in a cell until you die of natural causes. We are not posing enough threat to these criminals. Watching Lock Up on MSNBC, most of the inmates will never be functioning citizens, some of them admit they need to be behind a cell. Why pay so much money for someone to rot in jail, they are no use to the orbit and call in they need to be put down, just like a viscous dog at the pound. If the vet determines the animal is too bellicose they euthanize the animal because they can never be adopted out, I think we can use the same concept in our correctional system.With an overpopulated correctional system, and the realignment bill 109 there will be many criminals back on the streets, which only adds to the problem for every other component of the criminal justice system. The police are having a bigger population of criminals back on the streets and the departments have tight budgets and do not have enough notes to hire to a greater extent than help to contro l the streets. The sheriff and police departments then will have to stretch themselves thin to try to put the recommitting offenders back in the correction system. Which then puts the criminal back into the already overcrowded court system, which creates more of a problem because now there are even more cases which will create bigger case loads and slow down the already slow system. ConclusionIn this paper I discussed the past, current, and future trends in corrections. In the past the punishments were cruel, and now we are focused more on rehabilitation and California facilities are being over crowded. I also analyzed current and future issues facing the overpopulated prisons. The budget shortfall is only going to get worse and these problems within the criminal justice system is only going to get bigger and bigger. Bill AB 109 was put into affect to help relieve the budget issue but as I discussed I think that it is a short-term solution because of the recidivism rates. The crimin al justice system is always growing and changing to receive the needs of the communities they protect.